4.6 Article

Engineering the Structure and Rheological Properties of P407 Hydrogels via Reverse Poloxamer Addition

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 39, Issue 14, Pages 5084-5094

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00088

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Commercially available and nontoxic poloxamer 407 (P407), a triblock polymer, undergoes a solution-to-gel transition with increasing temperature and is a potential candidate for injectable therapeutics. Addition of highly soluble reverse poloxamers (RPs) dramatically affects the gelation temperature, modulus, and morphology of P407-based hydrogels. This tunability allows for the design of thermoresponsive materials with specific properties.
Aqueous solutions of poloxamer 407 (P407), a commercially available and nontoxic ABA triblock polymer (PEOPPO-PEO), undergo a solution-to-gel transition with increasing temperature and are promising candidates for injectable therapeutics. The gel transition temperature, modulus, and structure are all dictated by polymer concentration, preventing independent tuning of these properties. Here, we show that addition of BAB reverse poloxamers (RPs) to P407-based solutions dramatically alters the gelation temperature, modulus, and morphology. Gelation temperature and RP localization within the hydrogel are dictated by RP solubility. Highly soluble RPs increase gelation temperature and incorporate primarily into the micelle corona regions. Alternatively, RPs with low aqueous solubility decrease gelation temperature and associate within the micelle core and core-corona interface. These differences in RP localization have significant implications for the hydrogel modulus and microstructure. The ability to tune gelation temperature, modulus, and structure through RP addition allows for the design of thermoresponsive materials with specific properties that are unobtainable with neat P407-based hydrogels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available