4.7 Article

Dynamic performance of root-reinforced slopes by centrifuge modeling tests

Journal

LANDSLIDES
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 1187-1210

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-023-02035-5

Keywords

Root reinforcement; Dynamic performance; Centrifuge modeling; Newmark's sliding block method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Slope instability is a significant problem in geotechnical engineering, which can result in catastrophic failure and loss of human lives. It can be induced by internal or external factors, and earthquakes are one of the external factors. There has been significant development in slope protection, with a focus on ecological protection to replace environmentally unfriendly stabilization methods. Centrifuge modeling tests showed that fibrous root system is more suitable for reinforcing sandy soil slopes compared to taproot system.
Slope instability is a major problem in geotechnical engineering and can cause catastrophic failure and the loss of human lives. Generally, slope instability can be induced by either internal or external factors. An earthquake is one such external factor, as was demonstrated during the Chi-Chi earthquake in 1999 and the Kumamoto earthquake in 2016. There has been considerable development of slope protection for reducing slope instability susceptibility, and currently, more attention is being given to ecological protection. It is hoped that green engineering can replace environmentally unfriendly and unfeasible slope stabilization methods. Therefore, a series of centrifuge modeling tests was conducted to evaluate the performance of a root-reinforced slope under gravity and dynamic conditions. The test results show that the fibrous root system is more suitable for sandy soil slope reinforcement than the taproot system under gravity and a small base input motion (PBA approximately equal to or the image of 0.15 g, intensity VI on the MMI scale). The fibrous root system, on average, had a 32% higher critical height, 61% smaller sliding area ratio, 36% lower depletion volume of soil mass, 49% lower accumulation volume of soil mass, and 5.5% higher yield acceleration under both conditions in comparison to the taproot system. However, both reinforcement systems are susceptible to failure under large input motion (PBA approximately equal to or the image of 0.30 g, intensity VII on the MMI scale) cases but provide better stability for the toe area than the unreinforced soil counterpart, as shown by depletion and accumulation in soil volume and by higher yield acceleration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available