4.7 Review

3D visualisations for communicative urban and landscape planning: What systematic mapping of academic literature can tell us of their potential?

Journal

LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING
Volume 234, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104716

Keywords

3D model; Collaborative planning; Digital twin; Land use planning; Participation; Spatial planning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Public participation and collaboration in urban and landscape planning are greatly enhanced by digital technologies' capabilities. However, the understanding of 3D visualizations' benefits and usability in practical planning contexts has not caught up with the technical advancements. There is a lack of literature reviews or systematic mapping on the usability of specific 3D visualizations or the current research gaps in this field. To address this need, we conducted a systematic mapping of recent case studies on 3D visualizations in communicative urban and landscape planning, revealing the diversity of planning contexts and solutions, as well as the scarcity of real-life planning cases and rigorous usability evaluations.
Public participation and collaboration supported by the opportunities that digital technologies offer are prolific themes in urban and landscape planning. In the past two decades, there has been a growing interest in the ca- pacity of 3D visualisations to support citizen and stakeholder engagement in communicative planning processes. However, the technical advances of 3D visualisations still outstrip the current understanding of their benefits, appropriate uses and usability in practical planning contexts. There are no reviews or systematic mapping of literature, to our knowledge, that investigate the available evidence on the usability of particular 3D visual- isations or that document the scope and gaps in current research on 3D applications in communicative planning. To answer this need we conducted a systematic mapping of academic literature reporting recent case studies of 3D visualisations that have been utilised or developed for communicative urban and landscape planning con- texts. We follow established guidelines for systematic reviews and used Scopus and Web of Science as primary electronic databases. Altogether, we reviewed 46 case studies globally. Our findings highlight the heterogeneity of planning contexts and purposes, terminology and technological 3D solutions. Moreover, the scarcity of real - life planning cases and robust and well-documented usability evaluations are evident in the literature. We discuss limitations of the existing academic literature for evidence-based understanding and suggest a common framework for reporting in the field of participatory and collaborative 3D visualisations to enable more rigorous and systematic evaluation of the usability and benefits of these technologies in urban and landscape planning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available