4.8 Article

Relationship between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure and mortality: an observational cohort study in 59 124 patients

Journal

LANCET
Volume 401, Issue 10393, Pages 2041-2050

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00733-X

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to examine the associations of clinic and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. The results showed that ambulatory blood pressure, especially night-time blood pressure, was more informative about the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular death than clinic blood pressure. This study has important implications for the assessment of health outcomes in patients with hypertension.
Background Ambulatory blood pressure provides a more comprehensive assessment than clinic blood pressure, and has been reported to better predict health outcomes than clinic or home pressure. We aimed to examine associations of clinic and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a large cohort of primary care patients referred for assessment of hypertension. Methods We did an observational cohort study using clinic and ambulatory blood pressure data obtained from March 1, 2004, to Dec 31, 2014, from the Spanish Ambulatory Blood Pressure Registry. This registry included patients from 223 primary care centres from the Spanish National Health System in all 17 regions of Spain. Mortality data (date and cause) were ascertained by a computerised search of the vital registry of the Spanish National Institute of Statistics. Complete data were available for age, sex, all blood pressure measures, and BMI. For each study participant, follow-up was from the date of their recruitment to the date of death or Dec 31, 2019, whichever occurred first. Cox models were used to estimate associations between usual clinic or ambulatory blood pressure and mortality, adjusted for confounders and additionally for alternative measures of blood pressure. For each measure of blood pressure, we created five groups (ie, fifths) defined by quintiles of that measure among those who subsequently died. Findings During a median follow-up of 9 & BULL;7 years, 7174 (12 & BULL;1%) of 59 124 patients died, including 2361 (4 & BULL;0%) from cardiovascular causes. J-shaped associations were observed for several blood pressure measures. Among the top four baseline-defined fifths, 24-h systolic blood pressure was more strongly associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 1 & BULL;41 per 1 - SD increment [95% CI 1 & BULL;36-1 & BULL;47]) than clinic systolic blood pressure (1 & BULL;18 [1 & BULL;13-1 & BULL;23]). After adjustment for clinic blood pressure, 24-h blood pressure remained strongly associated with all-cause deaths (HR 1 & BULL;43 [95% CI 1 & BULL;37-1 & BULL;49]), but the association between clinic blood pressure and all-cause death was attenuated when adjusted for 24-h blood pressure (1 & BULL;04 [1 & BULL;00-1 & BULL;09]). Compared with the informativeness of clinic systolic blood pressure (100%), night-time systolic blood pressure was most informative about risk of all-cause death (591%) and cardiovascular death (604%). Relative to blood pressure within the normal range, elevated all-cause mortality risks were observed for masked hypertension (HR 1 & BULL;24 [95% CI 1 & BULL;12-1 & BULL;37]) and sustained hypertension (1 & BULL;24 [1 & BULL;15-1 & BULL;32]), but not white-coat hypertension, and elevated cardiovascular mortality risks were observed for masked hypertension (1 & BULL;37 [1 & BULL;15-1 & BULL;63]) and sustained hypertension (1 & BULL;38 [1 & BULL;22-1 & BULL;55]), but not white-coat hypertension. Interpretation Ambulatory blood pressure, particularly night-time blood pressure, was more informative about the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular death than clinic blood pressure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available