4.8 Article

T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies in cancer

Journal

LANCET
Volume 402, Issue 10396, Pages 142-158

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00521-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have shown significant activity in targeting various antigens in haematological malignancies. However, progress in solid tumors has been slower due to the lack of tumor-specific therapeutic targets and the frequent occurrence of cytokine release syndrome. Nevertheless, the recognition of a peptide fragment of gp100 in uveal melanoma patients has demonstrated marked activity.
T-cell-engaging bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) simultaneously bind to antigens on tumour cells and CD3 subunits on T cells. This simultaneous binding results in the recruitment of T cells to the tumour, followed by T-cell activation and degranulation, and tumour cell elimination. T-cell-engaging BsAbs have shown substantial activity in several haematological malignancies by targeting CD19 in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, CD20 in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and BCMA and GPRC5D in multiple myeloma. Progress with solid tumours has been slower, in part due to the paucity of therapeutic targets with a tumour-specific expression profile, which is needed to limit on-target offtumour side-effects. Nevertheless, BsAb-mediated recognition of a peptide fragment of gp100 presented by HLA-A2:01 molecules has shown marked activity in patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma. Cytokine release syndrome is the most frequent toxicity associated with BsAb treatment and is caused by activated T cells secreting proinflammatory cytokines. Understanding of resistance mechanisms has resulted in the development of new T cellredirecting formats and novel combination strategies, which are expected to further improve depth and duration of response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available