3.9 Article

3D Printing as an Effective Quality Assurance Implementation in Massive-Scale SARS-CoV-2 Testing at a SwabSeq Next-Generation Sequencing Laboratory

Journal

LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 512-518

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/labmed/lmac161

Keywords

sequencing; genetics; SARS-CoV-2; virology; 3D printing; quality assurance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of the SwabSeq diagnostic platform for massive-scale SARS-CoV-2 testing presented challenges in quality assurance due to the novelty and scale of sequencing-based testing. To address mapping errors, we implemented quality control measures by placing negative controls alongside patient samples. We developed 2D paper templates for single racks and 3D printed plastic templates for multiple racks, significantly reducing plate mapping errors.
Massive-scale SARS-CoV-2 testing using the SwabSeq diagnostic platform came with quality assurance challenges due to the novelty and scale of sequencing-based testing. The SwabSeq platform relies on accurate mapping between specimen identifiers and molecular barcodes to match a result back to a patient specimen. To identify and mitigate mapping errors, we instituted quality control using placement of negative controls within a rack of patient samples. We designed 2-dimensional paper templates to fit over a 96-position rack of specimens with holes to show the control tube placements. We designed and 3-dimensionally printed plastic templates that fit onto 4 racks of patient specimens and provide accurate indications of the correct control tube placements. The final plastic templates dramatically reduced plate mapping errors from 22.55% in January 2021 to less than 1% after implementation and training in January 2021. We show how 3D printing can be a cost-effective quality assurance tool to mitigate human error in the clinical laboratory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available