4.3 Article

Improving the Hope and Happiness of Patients With an Ostomy Effects of Group Cognitive Therapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 131-136

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000948

Keywords

Group cognitive therapy; Happiness; Hope; Ostomy; Ostomy patients

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of group cognitive therapy (GCT) on hope and happiness in patients with ostomy. The findings of the study showed that GCT significantly enhanced hope and happiness in patients with ostomy following 12 GCT sessions.
PURPOSE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of group cognitive therapy (GCT) on hope and happiness in patients with ostomy. DESIGN:A single-group before-after study. SUBJECTS AND SETTING:The sample comprised 30 patients living with an ostomy for at least 30 days. Their mean age was 64.5 (SD 10.5) years; most were male (66.7%, n = 20). METHODS:The study setting was a large ostomy care center in the city of Kerman, located in southeastern Iran. The intervention was 12 GCT sessions, each lasted 90 minutes. Data were collected before and 1 month after GCT sessions using a questionnaire designed for purposes of this study. The questionnaire queried demographic and pertinent clinical data, and incorporated 2 validated instruments: the Miller Hope Scale and the Oxford Happiness Inventory. RESULTS:The mean pretest score on the Miller Hope Scale was 121.9 (SD 16.7) and the mean score on the Oxford Happiness Scale was 31.9 (SD 7.8); posttest mean scores were 180.4 (SD 12.1) and 53.4 (SD 8.3), respectively. Scores on both instruments significantly increased in patients living with an ostomy following 3 GCT sessions (P = .0001). CONCLUSION:Findings suggest that GCT enhances hope and happiness in persons living with an ostomy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available