4.1 Article

Therapeutic efficacy of enrofloxacin in treatment of Francisella orientalis infections in juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.)

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jvp.13382

Keywords

antibiotic therapy; carrier state; enrofloxacin; medicated feed; outbreaks control; oxytetracycline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the therapeutic efficacy of the antibiotics enrofloxacin and oxytetracycline against francisellosis in juvenile Nile tilapia. The results showed that enrofloxacin at a dose of 10 mg/kg of live weight is effective against francisellosis in Nile tilapia.
Outbreaks of infections by Francisella orientalis represent one of the main obstacles to Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) farming. It is responsible for acute mortality in fingerlings and juveniles. The main control measure available is oral antibiotic therapy. This study compared the therapeutic efficacy of the antibiotics enrofloxacin and oxytetracycline, the most commonly used antimicrobial, against francisellosis in juvenile Nile tilapia (O. niloticus). Fish were challenged with a virulent isolate of F. orientalis and treated with medicated feed containing one of two doses of oxytetracycline (100 or 300 mg/kg of live weight (LW)) or 10 mg/kg of LW of enrofloxacin. The positive and negative control groups received feed without antibiotics; the negative control group was unchallenged. The results showed that enrofloxacin at a dose of 10 mg/kg of LW is effective against francisellosis in juvenile Nile tilapia (O. niloticus). Treatment with oxytetracycline did not eliminate the pathogen from the infected host, and the surviving fish became carriers. Enrofloxacin was able to cure the fish of infection with F. orientalis. This study suggests that enrofloxacin is a better option for treating francisellosis in Nile tilapia (O. niloticus L.). It controls mortality and avoids the carrier state in the fish, thus reducing the possibility of recurrence in the affected batches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available