4.5 Review

A systematic review of frailty assessment tools used in vascular surgery research

Journal

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 78, Issue 6, Pages 1567-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2023.06.010

Keywords

Aging; Vascular surgical procedures; Population health; Quality improvement; Primary prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically reviewed the variety of frailty assessment tools in vascular patients and described their content and application. The study found substantial heterogeneity in frailty assessment and recommended a uniform approach to guide future research. The Clinical Frailty Scale was identified as a validated tool with good psychometric properties in vascular surgery.
Objective: Frailty is common in vascular patients and is recognized for its prognostic value. In the absence of consensus, a multitude of frailty assessment tools exist. This systematic review aimed to quantify the variety in these tools and describe their content and application to inform future research and clinical practice. Methods: Multiple cross-disciplinary electronic literature databases were searched from inception to August 2022. Studies describing frailty assessment in a vascular surgical population were eligible. Data extraction to a validated template included patient demographics, tool content, and analysis methods. A secondary systematic search for papers describing the psychometric properties of commonly used frailty tools was then performed. Results: Screening 5358 records identified 111 eligible studies, with an aggregate population of 5,418,236 patients. Fortythree differing frailty assessment tools were identified. One-third of these failed to assess frailty as a multidomain deficit and there was a reliance on assessing function and presence of comorbidity. Substantial methodological variability in data analysis and lack of methodological description was also identified. Published psychometric assessment was available for only 4 of the 10 most commonly used frailty tools. The Clinical Frailty Scale was the most studied and demonstrates good psychometric properties within a surgical population. Conclusions: Substantial heterogeneity in frailty assessment is demonstrated, precluding meaningful comparisons of services and data pooling. A uniform approach to assessment is required to guide future frailty research. Based on the literature, we make the following recommendations: frailty should be considered a continuous construct and the reporting of frailty tools' application needs standardized. In the absence of consensus, the Clinical Frailty Scale is a validated tool with good psychometric properties that demonstrates usefulness in vascular surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available