4.5 Article

Sonographic Characteristics and Interval Changes of Subacute Thyroiditis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 1653-1659

Publisher

AMER INST ULTRASOUND MEDICINE
DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.09049

Keywords

configuration; follow-up; head and neck ultrasound; sonography; subacute thyroiditis; thyroid

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives-This study aimed to assess the sonographic characteristics and interval changes of subacute thyroiditis using follow-up sonography. Methods-From January 2008 to December 2014, 85 patients with clinically suspected subacute thyroiditis underwent sonographic examinations by a single radiologist. Subacute thyroiditis was confirmed on the basis of the clinical, sonographic, and cyto-histopathologic findings. On the initial and follow-up sonograms, the individual sonographic findings and interval changes were retrospectively investigated by the same radiologist. According to the sonographic configuration, subacute thyroiditis lesions were categorized as nodular or non-nodular. The interval changes in the lesions were classified as follows: disappeared, decreased, increased, eventually smaller, eventually larger, or no interval change. Results-Subacute thyroiditis was confirmed in 64 of the 85 patients. In these 64 patients, nodular (n = 39) and non-nodular (n = 35) lesions were found; 10 patients had both nodular and non-nodular lesions. Of the 64 patients, 41 underwent sonographic follow-up. In both nodular and non-nodular lesions, the common interval changes included disappeared, decreased, and eventually smaller patterns. Although the increased pattern was found only in 4 nodular lesions, there was no significant difference in the interval changes between nodular and non-nodular lesions. On follow-up sonography, a new lesion was detected in 6 patients. Conclusions-The prevalence rate of nodular subacute thyroiditis lesions on sonography was high, and the interval changes in the lesions were variable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available