Journal
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jum.16285
Keywords
arterial elastance; augmented velocity index; hypertension; renal resistive index; ventricular elastance; ventriculoarterial coupling
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study aimed to investigate the presence of cardiorenal interaction at subclinical level in patients with hypertension. The researchers used renal Doppler ultrasonographic parameter-augmented velocity index (Avi) and an echocardiographic measure-ventriculoarterial coupling to examine the relationship between the heart and kidney. They found that renal Avi was a more reliable and promising index for measuring subclinical changes in the cardiorenal circulation compared to renal resistive index (RI).
Objective-It's a well-known scientific statement that the heart and kidney functions are frequently tied together and the impairment of one directly alters the other. However, there exist knowledge gaps about this intricate pathophysiologic link and the exact unifying mechanism is not established. Herein, we aimed to investigate the presence of cardiorenal interaction at subclinical level while the conventional cardiac and renal clinical parameters are not disrupted yet in patients with hypertension. Methods- We chose a novel renal Doppler ultrasonographic parameter-augmented velocity index (Avi)-and an echocardiographic measure-ventriculoarterial coupling-which is complex to analyze but increasingly used after its acceptance about being a key determinant of cardiovascular efficiency. We recruited 137 patients without a previous history of antihypertensive medication use (47.4% women; median age, 49 years). Renal Avi, renal resistive index (RI), arterial elastance (E-a), ventricular elastance (E-es) and E-a/E-es (ventriculoarterial coupling) parameters were all examined. Results- Renal Avi, E-a, and E-a/E-es values were higher in females. Correlation analysis revealed that renal Avi was correlated with many hemodynamic variables including E-a and E-a/E-es. On multiple linear regression analysis, E-a and E-a/E-es remained as significant independent predictors of renal Avi but not of renal RI after adjustments for co-variables (beta = 0.488, P < .001 for E-a; beta = 0.380, P < .001 for E-a/E-es). Conclusions- In comparison to renal RI, we suggest that renal Avi is a more reliable and promising index that can even measure subclinical changes in the cardiorenal circulation which needs to be elucidated.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available