4.4 Article

Multiphysics modeling of metal based additive manufacturing processes with focus on thermomechanical conditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL STRESSES
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 445-463

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01495739.2023.2195513

Keywords

FEM; metal additive manufacturing; residual stresses; thermo-mechanical modeling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal additive manufacturing (MAM) has seen significant growth in production performance and knowledge, but production defects are still a challenge due to the temperature development and residual stresses during printing. This study describes the modeling techniques of MAM, with a focus on thermomechanical modeling. Flash Heating (FH) and Sequential Flash Heating (SFH) methods show promise in providing reliable results in a short simulation time. Four case studies are presented and validated, and it is envisioned that FH and SFH methods can be part of a multi-scale, multi-physics modeling framework.
Metal additive manufacturing (MAM) has been experiencing huge growth thanks to the increase in production performance as well as our fundamental knowledge of the process. Production defects are, however, slowing down the implementation of components produced with this technology. Such defects, like porosities and distortions, are mainly related to the temperature development (and the subsequent residual stresses) within the part during printing. Prediction of temperatures and stresses during production is still challenging due to the complexity of the process, requiring experimental tests as well as numerical simulations to achieve the desired components. In this work, the main modeling techniques of MAM from micro- to part-scale are described, with focus on thermomechanical modeling. Some reduced order methods have been developed in this field and among these, Flash Heating (FH) and Sequential Flash Heating (SFH) have shown the possibility of obtaining reliable numerical results within short simulation times, thanks to the lumping of the part into meta-layers. Four case studies involving both LPBF and DED are presented and validated against proper experiments. Based on this, it is envisioned that FH and SFH methods can be part of a multi-scale, multi-physics modeling framework, in which models at different length-scales are coupled.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available