4.4 Article

Effect of Substrate Materials on Deposition Behavior and Properties of Fe-Based Amorphous D-Gun Coatings

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL SPRAY TECHNOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 2221-2235

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11666-023-01617-y

Keywords

bonding strength; deposition characteristics; Fe-based amorphous coating; interfacial toughness; three-point bending

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fe-based amorphous coatings were deposited on AZ31B alloy and Q235 steel substrates via detonation spray. The deposition mechanisms and mechanical properties of the coatings on magnesium alloy substrates were investigated through parallel comparison experiments. The results showed good bonding and high resilience against interfacial stresses in the coating on the AZ31B substrate, but the high thermal conductivity and low hardness of the magnesium alloy compromised the bonding strength and wear resistance of the AZ31B-substrate coating.
Fe-based amorphous coatings were deposited on AZ31B alloy and Q235 steel substrates though detonation spray. Parallel comparison experiments on deposition characteristics, residual stresses, interfacial toughness, bonding strengths, three-point bending behaviors, and tribological behaviors of the coatings were investigated to elucidate the deposition mechanisms and mechanical properties of the Fe-based amorphous coatings on magnesium alloy substrates. The results revealed that the coating on the AZ31B substrate was well bonded via physical and mechanical bonding mechanisms, and the interface was found to be highly resilient against interfacial stresses generated from substrate deformations. However, the high thermal conductivity and low hardness of the magnesium alloy hindered the flattening of the sprayed particles during the deposition process, which compromised the bonding strength of the lamellae layers, thus reducing the cohesive strength and the wear resistance of the AZ31B-substrate coating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available