4.6 Article

Prediction of the mechanical response of a 3D (bio)printed hybrid scaffold for improving bone tissue regeneration by structural finite element analysis

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105822

Keywords

MSC-secretome; 3D coprinting; Mechanical characterization; Computational model; Finite element analysis; Bone tissue engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the mechanical properties of a coprinted hybrid scaffold made of poly-caprolactone (PCL) and an alginate-based hydrogel. The scaffold aims to have in vivo bio-integration and load-bearing capabilities. Structural finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted to study the impact of alginate inclusion and infill patterns on scaffold stiffness.
Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering should be osteoinductive, osteoconductive, biocompatible, biodegradable, and, at the same time, exhibit proper mechanical properties.The present study investigated the mechanical properties of a coprinted hybrid scaffold made of poly-caprolactone (PCL) and an alginate-based hydrogel, which was conceived to possess a double function of in vivo bio-integration (due to the ability of the hydrogel to release lyosecretome, a freeze-dried formulation of mesenchymal stem cell secretome with osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties) and withstanding loads (due to the presence of polycaprolactone, which provides mechanical resistance).To this end, an in-silico study was conducted to predict mechanical properties. Structural finite element analysis (FEA) of the hybrid scaffold under compression was performed to compare the numerical results with the corresponding experimental data. The impact of alginate inclusion and infill patterns on scaffold stiffness was investigated.Results show an increase in mechanical properties by changing the scaffold infill pattern (linear: 145.38 +/- 28.90 vs. honeycomb: 278.96 +/- 50.19, mean and standard deviation, n = 8), while alginate inclusion does not always impact the mechanical performance of the hybrid scaffold (stiffness: 145.38 +/- 28.90 vs. 195.42 +/- 38.68 N/ mm, with vs without hydrogel inclusion, respectively). This is confirmed by FEA analysis, in which a good correspondence between experimental and numerical stiffness is shown (142 +/- 28.94 vs. 117.18, respectively, linear scaffold with hydrogel inclusion).In conclusion, the computational framework is a valid tool for predicting the mechanical performance of scaffolds and is promising for future clinical applications in the maxillofacial field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available