4.0 Article

Silicone nanomicelle dyeing method on polyester fibre: Comparative evaluation of chemical properties, fastness properties, and DFT

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jics.2023.100960

Keywords

Silicone nanoemulsion method; Photophysical properties; Dyeing comparison methods; Fastness properties; Eletrophilicity index

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Disperse Red 177(9a), Disperse Red 343(9b), Disperse Blue 165(9c), Disperse Blue 165.1(9d), Disperse Blue 366 (9e), and Disperse Blue 148(9f) were studied in a solvent. The use of 9 (a-f) azo disperse dyes on polyester fabric, along with traditional and silicone nanomicelle techniques, resulted in equal washing, light, and rubbing fastness. The reduction in particle size of azo dyes through nanoemulsions allowed for direct transportation into the fiber core, eliminating the need for auxiliary dyes.
Disperse Red 177(9a), Disperse Red 343(9b), Disperse Blue 165(9c), Disperse Blue 165.1(9d), Disperse Blue 366 (9e), and Disperse Blue 148(9f) were examined in the solvent. During silicon nanomicelle dyeing, we employed 9 (a-f) azo disperse dyes on polyester. On polyester fabric, dye 9(a-f) offers equal washing, light, and rubbing fastness in both the conventional and silicone nanomicelle techniques. The dye can now be transported directly into the fibre core without the use of auxiliary dyes owing to the reduction in the particle size of azo dyes, which is made possible by nanoemulsions superior dispersion. The levelling property of the dispersed dye is enhanced by the dyeing process. When both techniques are applied, the lightfastness properties of all dyes are improved. It provides a very good to outstanding protection factor for textile materials. These 9(a-f) azo disperse dyes have moderate to outstanding photostability, net electrophilicity index, and lightfastness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available