4.6 Article

Are we there yet? Ten persistent hazards and inefficiencies with the use of medication administration technology from the perspective of practicing nurses

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad031

Keywords

medication administration record; BCMA; patient safety; health information technology design; perception-action cycle; cognitive support systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to identify persistent hazards and inefficiencies in inpatient medication administration, explore the cognitive attributes of medication administration tasks, and discuss strategies to reduce technology-related hazards. Interviews were conducted with 32 nurses, and qualitative analysis revealed persistent safety hazards and inefficiencies in medication administration. Despite the implementation of barcode medication administration and electronic medication administration record, errors may still persist in medication administration.
Objectives (1) Characterize persistent hazards and inefficiencies in inpatient medication administration; (2) Explore cognitive attributes of medication administration tasks; and (3) Discuss strategies to reduce medication administration technology-related hazards. Materials and Methods Interviews were conducted with 32 nurses practicing at 2 urban, eastern and western US health systems. Qualitative analysis using inductive and deductive coding included consensus discussion, iterative review, and coding structure revision. We abstracted hazards and inefficiencies through the lens of risks to patient safety and the cognitive perception-action cycle (PAC). Results Persistent safety hazards and inefficiencies related to MAT organized around the PAC cycle included: (1) Compatibility constraints create information silos; (2) Missing action cues; (3) Intermittent communication flow between safety monitoring systems and nurses; (4) Occlusion of important alerts by other, less helpful alerts; (5) Dispersed information: Information required for tasks is not collocated; (6) Inconsistent data organization: Mismatch of the display and the user's mental model; (7) Hidden medication administration technologies (MAT) limitations: Inaccurate beliefs about MAT functionality contribute to overreliance on the technology; (8) Software rigidity causes workarounds; (9) Cumbersome dependencies between technology and the physical environment; and (10) Technology breakdowns require adaptive actions. Discussion Errors might persist in medication administration despite successful Bar Code Medication Administration and Electronic Medication Administration Record deployment for reducing errors. Opportunities to improve MAT require a deeper understanding of high-level reasoning in medication administration, including control over the information space, collaboration tools, and decision support. Conclusion Future medication administration technology should consider a deeper understanding of nursing knowledge work for medication administration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available