4.7 Article

Improved Outcomes After Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.052

Keywords

cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; congenital heart disease; pulmonary valve replacement; tetralogy of Fallot

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to determine whether pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) is associated with improved survival and freedom from sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF). The results showed that patients who received PVR had a lower risk of death or sustained VT compared to those who did not receive PVR.
BACKGROUND The impact of pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) on major adverse clinical outcomes in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) is unknown.OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine whether PVR is associated with improved survival and freedom from sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) in rTOF.METHODS A PVR propensity score was created to adjust for baseline differences between PVR and non-PVR patients enrolled in INDICATOR (International Multicenter TOF Registry). The primary outcome was time to the earliest occurrence of death or sustained VT. PVR and non-PVR patients were matched 1:1 on PVR propensity score (matched cohort) and in the full cohort, modeling was performed with propensity score as a covariate adjustment.RESULTS Among 1,143 patients with rTOF (age 27 & PLUSMN; 14 years, 47% PVR, follow-up 8.3 & PLUSMN; 5.2 years), the primary outcome occurred in 82. The adjusted HR for the primary outcome for PVR vs no-PVR (matched cohort n = 524) was 0.41 (95% CI: 0.21-0.81; multivariable model P = 0.010). Full cohort analysis revealed similar results. Subgroup analysis suggested beneficial effects in patients with advanced right ventricular (RV) dilatation (interaction P = 0.046; full cohort). In patients with RV end-systolic volume index >80 mL/m2, PVR was associated with a lower primary outcome risk (HR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.16-0.62; P < 0.001). There was no association between PVR and the primary outcome in patients with RV end-systolic volume index #80 mL/m2 (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.38-1.92; P = 0.70). CONCLUSIONS Compared with rTOF patients who did not receive PVR, propensity score-matched individuals receiving PVR had lower risk of a composite endpoint of death or sustained VT. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;81:2075-2085) & COPY; 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available