4.7 Article

Multimodality Imaging of Right Heart Function JACC Scientific Statement

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 19, Pages 1954-1973

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.392

Keywords

multimodality imaging; right ventricle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Right ventricular (RV) size and function assessed by multimodality imaging are associated with outcomes in various cardiovascular diseases. Understanding RV anatomy and physiology is crucial for comprehending the strengths and weaknesses of current imaging methods and providing context for these measurements. The adaptation of the RV to different types and severities of stress, especially over time, is specific to the cardiovascular disease process. Multimodality imaging parameters, which determine outcomes, reflect the ability to image the initial and longitudinal RV response to stress. This paper reviews the standard and novel imaging methods for assessing RV function and discusses the impact of these parameters on outcomes in specific disease states.
Right ventricular (RV) size and function assessed by multimodality imaging are associated with outcomes in a variety of cardiovascular diseases. Understanding RV anatomy and physiology is essential in appreciating the strengths and weaknesses of current imaging methods and gives these measurements greater context. The adaptation of the right ventricle to different types and severity of stress, particularly over time, is specific to the cardiovascular disease process. Multimodality imaging parameters, which determine outcomes, reflect the ability to image the initial and longitudinal RV response to stress. This paper will review the standard and novel imaging methods for assessing RV function and the impact of these parameters on outcomes in specific disease states. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;81:1954-1973) (c) 2023 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available