4.7 Article

Vein Graft Use and Long-Term Survival Following Coronary Bypass Grafting

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 8, Pages 713-725

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.054

Keywords

coronary artery bypass grafting; Medicare; single artery graft; vein grafts

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This retrospective observational study investigated the association between surgeon's vein graft utilization and long-term survival in Medicare beneficiaries undergoing single arterial graft coronary artery bypass grafting (SAG-CABG). The study found no significant difference in long-term survival between patients operated on by surgeons who were conservative or liberal in their vein graft utilization, suggesting a conservative approach to vein graft utilization is reasonable.
BACKGROUND Although placement of at least 1 arterial graft during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has a proven survival benefit, it is unknown what degree of revascularization with saphenous vein grafting (SVG) is associated with improved survival. OBJECTIVES The authors sought to determine whether undergoing surgery performed by a surgeon who is liberal with vein graft utilization is associated with improved survival in patients undergoing single arterial graft CABG (SAG-CABG). METHODS This was a retrospective, observational study of SAG-CABG performed in Medicare beneficiaries from 2001 to 2015. Surgeons were stratified by number of SVG utilized per SAG-CABG into conservative (>= 1 SD below mean), average (within 1 SD of mean), and liberal (>= 1 SD above mean). Long-term survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared among surgeon groups before and after augmented inverse-probability weighting. RESULTS There were 1,028,264 Medicare beneficiaries undergoing SAG-CABG from 2001 to 2015 (mean age 72.0 +/- 7.9 years, 68.3% male). Over time, 1-vein and 2-vein SAG-CABG utilization increased, whereas 3-vein and >= 4-vein SAG-CABG utilization decreased (P < 0.001). Surgeons who were conservative vein graft users performed a mean 1.7 +/- 0.2 vein grafts per SAG-CABG, whereas those who were liberal vein graft users performed a mean 2.9 +/- 0.2 vein grafts per SAG-CABG. Weighted analysis demonstrated no difference in median survival among patients undergoing SAG-CABG by liberal vs conservative vein graft users (adjusted median survival difference 27 days). CONCLUSIONS Among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing SAG-CABG, there is no association between surgeon pro-clivity for vein graft utilization and long-term survival, suggesting that a conservative approach to vein graft utilization is reasonable. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;81:713-725) (c) 2023 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available