4.8 Article

MOF-Derived Ru1Zr1/Co Dual-Atomic-Site Catalyst with Promoted Performance for Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 145, Issue 13, Pages 7113-7122

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c09168

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A dual-atomic-site catalyst, Ru1Zr1/Co, was designed for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS), showing enhanced FTS activity and C5+ selectivity. The synergic effect between Ru and Zr single-atom site on Co NPs contributes to the improved performance.
Cobalt-based catalysts have been widely used for Fischer- Tropsch synthesis (FTS) in industry; however, achieving rational catalyst design at the atomic level and thereby a higher activity and more long-chain-hydrocarbon products simultaneously remain an attractive and difficult challenge. The dual-atomic-site catalysts with unique electronic and geometric interface interactions offer a great opportunity for exploiting advanced FTS catalysts with improved performance. Herein, we designed a Ru1Zr1/Co catalyst with Ru and Zr dual atomic sites on the Co nanoparticle (NP) surface through a metal-organic-framework-mediated synthesis strategy which presents greatly enhanced FTS activity (high turnover frequency of 3.8 x 10-2s-1 at 200 degrees C) and C5+ selectivity (80.7%). Control experiments presented a synergic effect between Ru and Zr single-atom site on Co NPs. Further density functional theory calculations of the chain growth process from C1 to C5 revealed that the designed Ru/Zr dual sites remarkably lower the rate-limiting barriers due to the significantly weakened C-O bond and promote the chain growth processes, resulting in the greatly boosted FTS performance. Therefore, our work demonstrates the effectiveness of dual-atomic-site design in promoting the FTS performance and provides new opportunities for developing efficient industrial catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available