4.7 Article

Field strength effect on elastoplastic behavior of aluminoborosilicate glass: II. Volumetric recovery

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY
Volume 106, Issue 9, Pages 5213-5232

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jace.19152

Keywords

aluminoborosilicate; elasticity; field strength; glass; plasticity; volumetric recovery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The field strength effect of different network modifiers on the elastoplastic properties of aluminoborosilicate glasses was investigated through a volumetric recovery study. This research, along with Part I, examined the relationship between hardness, crack resistance, and other physical properties with glass elasticity. The results showed that the elastic volume fraction decreased with field strength for both alkali and alkaline earth glasses. The Poisson's ratio did not exhibit a trend with pile-up or shear flow volume fraction. The elastic-to-plastic deformation ratio increased with applied load and decreased with modifier field strength for both alkali and alkaline earth glasses, and an increase in plasticity correlated with increased hardness, crack resistance, and elastic moduli.
The field strength (FS) effect of six different network modifiers on the elastoplastic properties of aluminoborosilicate glasses was explored using a volumetric recovery study. This work, in conjunction with Part I, explored the intersection of hardness, crack resistance, and other physical properties with glass elasticity. Results showed that (1) the elastic volume fraction decreased with FS for both the alkali and alkaline earth (AE) glasses; (2) the Poisson's ratio did not trend with pile-up or shear flow volume fraction; (3) the elastic-to-plastic deformation ratio increased with applied load and decreased with modifier FS for both the alkali and AE glasses; and (4) an increase in plasticity correlated with increased hardness, crack resistance, and elastic moduli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available