4.5 Article

Developing Hemodynamic Valve Deterioration and Mortality in Aortic Valve Replacement

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 285, Issue -, Pages 236-242

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.035

Keywords

Aortic valve replacement; Bioprosthesis; Hemodynamic valve dysfunction

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), the development of hemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD) is a common concern. This study found that developing HVD was associated with a higher risk of death during follow-up.
Background: As life span increases, in patients having a bioprosthetic valve, the develop-ment of hemodynamic valve deterioration (HVD) is an important concern. We evaluated the association of developing HVD to survival in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Methods: The individuals undergoing isolated SAVR and serial echocardiography exams (interval >30 d) were included in this study. HVD was defined as mean pressure gradient >= 20 mmHg, mean pressure gradient >= 10 mmHg higher than in the baseline exam, or more than moderate regurgitation on Doppler echocardiography (moderate and severe grade). A time-dependent Cox proportional hazard model was used for this study. Results: A total of 631 patients were included. The mean age was 71.8 +/- 6.1 y old (female: 53.6%). HVD was found in 259 patients (41%) during echocardiographic follow-up (mean 3.3 +/- 3.0 y). Patient-prosthetic mismatch was found in 174 patients. One hundred and twenty-six patients died during follow-up (median 62.1 mo, interquartile range 31.1-96.8). The development of HVD was an independent risk factor for death during follow-up (P = 0.038, hazard ratio 1.46, 95% confidential interval: 1.02-2.08). Conclusions: HVD was common after bioprosthetic SAVR during mid-term follow-up. Developing HVD, including moderate and severe grades, was associated with a poor sur-vival rate compared with patients without HVD. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available