4.5 Article

Adjusting Drain Fluid Amylase for Drain Volume Does Not Improve Pancreatic Fistula Prediction

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 284, Issue -, Pages 312-317

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.11.030

Keywords

Abdominal drain; Amylase; CR-POPF; Distal pancreatectomy; Pancreatic fistula; Pancreatoduodenectomy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to investigate whether adjusting drain fluid amylase (DFA) for volume corrected drain fluid amylase (vDFA) could improve the prediction of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). The results showed that vDFA did not contribute to a superior CR-POPF predictive model compared to DFA, indicating that postoperative DFA remains the preferred method for predicting CR-POPF.
Introduction: Drain fluid amylase (DFA) levels have been used to predict clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) and guide postoperative drain management. Optimal DFA cutoff thresholds vary between studies, thereby prompting investigation of an alternative assessment technique. As DFA measurements could, in theory, be distorted by variations in ascites fluid production, we hypothesized that adjusting DFA for volume corrected drain fluid amylase (vDFA) would improve CR-POPF predictive models.Methods: A single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients, who underwent pan-creatoduodenectomies (PD) and distal pancreatectomies (DP) between 2013 and 2019, was performed. DFAs and vDFAs were measured on postoperative day (POD) 3. Clinicopatho-logic variables were compared between cohorts by univariable and multivariable analyses and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.Results: Patients developing a CR-POPF were more likely to be male and have elevated DFA, vDFA, and body mass index (BMI). vDFA use did not contribute to a superior CR-POPF pre-dictive model compared to DFA-a finding consistent on subanalysis of surgery type PD versus DP. In CR-POPF predictive models, DFA, vDFA, and male sex significantly improved CR-POPF predictive models when considering both surgery subtypes, while only DFA and vDFA significantly improved models when cohorts were segregated by surgery type. Conclusions: Postoperative DFA remains a preferred method of predicting CR-POPF as the proposed vDFA assessment technique only adds complexity without increased discriminability. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available