4.7 Article

Probabilistic prediction of coalescence flutter using measurements: Application to the flutter margin method

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION
Volume 571, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2023.117819

Keywords

Bayesian inference; Aeroelastic flutter; Flutter margin; Aeroelastic instability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reports the generalization of the Bayesian formulation of the flutter margin method, which improves the predictive performance by incorporating the joint prior of aeroelastic modal parameters. The improved algorithm reduces uncertainties in predicting flutter speed and can cut cost by reducing the number of flight tests.
Zimmerman and Weissenburger's flutter margin method is widely used to estimate the aeroelas-tic coalescence flutter speed. In contrast to aeroelastic decay rates, the flutter margin exhibits monotonic decay with respect to airspeed rendering it effective in extrapolating the flutter speed using flight test data conducted at pre-flutter airspeeds. This paper reports the generalization of the Bayesian formulation of the flutter margin method by Khalil et al. developed to tackle measurement and modeling uncertainties. This paper improves the predictive performance of the previous algorithm by incorporating the joint prior of aeroelastic modal frequencies and decay rates among airspeeds in order to better estimate the joint posterior of modal parameters using observational data. The modal parameter prior is constructed using the classical two-degree-of-freedom pitch-plunge aeroelastic model whose system matrices (e.g. structural stiffness and damping matrices) vary randomly. Such joint modal parameter prior enforces statistical dependence among posteriors of modal parameters and the associated flutter margins across airspeeds. Numerical studies demonstrate a considerable reduction of uncertainties on the predicted flutter speed obtained from the generalized Bayesian flutter margin method. This improved algorithm can cut cost by reducing the number of flight tests and better assess the uncertainty against aeroelastic flutter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available