4.3 Review

Advanced separator engineering strategies for reversible electrochemical zinc storage

Journal

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 1329-1344

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-023-05454-5

Keywords

Zinc ion battery; GF separator; Cellulose separator; Polymer separator

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zinc ion batteries are popular among researchers due to their safety, cost-effectiveness, and high energy density. However, the growth of dendrites on the Zn anode hinders the progress of zinc ion batteries. Various research efforts have focused on modifying the anode surface and electrolyte to address this issue. This review provides a rare technical overview of the separators in zinc ion batteries, highlighting their requirements, recent advancements in modification materials and mechanisms, and potential future developments.
Zinc ion batteries are favored by researchers because of their intrinsic safety, low cost, and high theoretical energy density. The serious dendrite growth of Zn anode during electrochemical deposition inhibits the development of zinc ion batteries currently. Many research works have been carried out to modify the zinc metal anode surface and aqueous electrolyte. Significantly, as the carrier of electrolyte and the bridge of ions, the separators show promising potential of inhibiting dendrites growth by regulating the ions migration and the electric field of the electrolyte-anode interface. However, a technical review about the separators of zinc ion batteries is still rare. In this review, the basic requirements of separators and the latest development of modification materials and mechanisms are summarized. Finally, the perspectives for further developments on the separators of zinc ion batteries are outlined. This review could offer useful information for the further development of separators for zinc ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available