Similar rates of revision surgery following primary anatomic compared with reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 70 years or older with glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a cohort study of 3791 patients

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty ( RTSA), initially indicated for cuff tear arthropathy, is increasingly used to treat elderly patients with primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA) and an intact rotator cuff. This is often done to avoid revision surgery in elderly patients for rotator cuff failure with anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) despite traditionally good outcomes of TSA. We sought to determine whether there was a difference in outcomes in patients aged >= 70 years who received RTSA vs. TSA for GHOA. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a US integrated health care system ' s shoulder arthroplasty registry. Patients aged >= 70 years who underwent primary shoulder arthroplasty for GHOA with an intact rotator cuff were included (20122021). RTSA was compared with TSA. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate all-cause revision risk during follow-up, whereas multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate 90-day emergency department (ED) visits and 90-day readmissions. Results: The final study sample comprised 685 RTSA patients and 3106 TSA patients. The mean age was 75.8 years (standard deviation, 4.6 years), and 43.4% of patients were men. After accounting for confounders, we observed no significant difference in all-cause revision risk for RTSA vs. TSA (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-1.58). The most common reason for revision following RTSA was glenoid component loosening ( 40.0%). Over half of revisions following TSA were for rotator cuff tear (54.0%). No difference based on procedure type was observed in the likelihood of 90-day ED visits (odds ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.711.26) and 90-day readmissions (odds ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 0.83-2.09). Conclusion: RTSA and TSA for GHOA with an intact rotator cuff in patients aged >= 70 years had a similar revision risk, as well as a similar likelihood of 90-day ED visits and readmissions. Although revision risk was similar, the most common causes of revision were different, with rotator cuff tears in TSA patients and glenoid component loosening in RTSA patients.

Automated summary

RTSA and TSA for GHOA with an intact rotator cuff in patients aged >= 70 years had similar revision risk, as well as a similar likelihood of 90-day ED visits and readmissions. However, the most common causes of revision differed, with rotator cuff tears in TSA patients and glenoid component loosening in RTSA patients.