4.1 Article

USING THE PUMPED AREA METHOD FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF RECREATIONAL RAZOR CLAM, SILIQUA PATULA POPULATIONS IN WASHINGTON STATE

Journal

JOURNAL OF SHELLFISH RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 91-98

Publisher

NATL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2983/035.042.0109

Keywords

Siliqua patula; shellfish; management; coastal; stock assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since 1898, the Pacific razor clam has been a valuable resource, contributing to coastal communities' economic revenue in the Pacific Northwest. Washington State adopted the Pumped Area Method in 1996 to accurately assess razor clam populations, utilizing a water pump and random sampling to estimate the total population. This method, combined with biweekly sampling of toxic algae, supports sustainable harvest and generates significant economic income for Washington State.
Since 1898, the Pacific razor clam, Siliqua patula has represented an important resource for commercial and recreational diggers and has been an important source of economic revenue to coastal communities in the Pacific Northwest from central California to southern Alaska. In 1996, Washington State adopted the Pumped Area Method as the preferred method to accurately assess populations of razor clams on coastal beaches. The Pumped Area Method utilizes a water pump and a series of hoses to draw water out of the surf to liquefy the clam bed exposing clams so they can be measured and recorded. This method relies on a fixed stratified random sampling of transects across all managed beaches to produce a robust estimate of the total population of clams. The Pumped Area Method has been adopted by state and tribal management agencies along the west coast to determine the total allowable catch in each management area but never been formally described. This method in conjunction with a biweekly sampling of toxic algae abundance supports the sustainable harvest of razor clams, providing up to 40 million dollars annually in economic income to the state of Washington for the last 25 y.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available