4.5 Review

Modern automated microextraction procedures for bioanalytical, environmental, and food analyses

Journal

JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE
Volume 46, Issue 15, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202300215

Keywords

analytical automation; automated microextraction; bioanalytical analysis; environmental analysis; food analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sample preparation is crucial for the analytical workflow, affecting throughput, costs, error, and contamination. To improve efficiency and minimize impacts, miniaturization and automation are necessary. This review summarizes recent developments in automated microextractions coupled with liquid chromatography, focusing on microextraction automation strategies and their applications in determining small organic molecules in various samples.
Sample preparation frequently is considered the most critical stage of the analytical workflow. It affects the analytical throughput and costs; moreover, it is the primary source of error and possible sample contamination. To increase efficiency, productivity, and reliability, while minimizing costs and environmental impacts, miniaturization and automation of sample preparation are necessary. Nowadays, several types of liquid-phase and solid-phase microextractions are available, as well as different automatization strategies. Thus, this review summarizes recent developments in automated microextractions coupled with liquid chromatography, from 2016 to 2022. Therefore, outstanding technologies and their main outcomes, as well as miniaturization and automation of sample preparation, are critically analyzed. Focus is given to main microextraction automation strategies, such as flow techniques, robotic systems, and column-switching approaches, reviewing their applications to the determination of small organic molecules in biological, environmental, and food/beverage samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available