4.5 Article

ICD-11 adjustment disorder following diagnostic procedures of prostate cancer: A 12-month follow-up study

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111214

Keywords

Adjustment disorder; ICD-11; Prostate cancer; Psycho-oncology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the trajectories of symptoms of ICD-11 adjustment disorder in patients diagnosed vs. non-diagnosed with prostate cancer before, after diagnostic procedures, and at 12-month follow-up. The results showed that male patients experienced increased levels of adjustment difficulties during the diagnostic process of prostate cancer.
Objective: The medical procedures in diagnosing or treating prostate cancer may impair adjustment and quality of life. The current prospective study aimed to evaluate the trajectories of symptoms of ICD-11 adjustment disorder in patients diagnosed vs. non-diagnosed with prostate cancer before (T1), after diagnostic procedures (T2), and at 12-month follow-up (3).Methods: In total, 96 male patients were recruited before prostate cancer diagnostic procedures. The mean age of the study participants at baseline was 63.5 (SD = 8.4), ranging from 47 to 80 years; 64% were diagnosed with prostate cancer. Adjustment disorder symptoms were measured using the Brief Adjustment Disorder Measure (ADNM-8).Results: The prevalence of ICD-11 adjustment disorder was 15% at T1, 13% at T2, and 3% at T3. The effect of cancer diagnosis was not significant on adjustment disorder. A medium main effect for time was detected on adjustment symptom severity, F(2, 134) = 19.26, p < .001, partial eta 2 = 0.223, with symptoms significantly lower at 12-month follow-up, compared to T1 and T2, p < .001.Conclusions: The study's findings reveal the increased levels of adjustment difficulties in males undergoing the diagnostic process of prostate cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available