4.6 Article

Post-error slowing predicts for relapse in individuals with alcohol use disorder

Journal

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages 441-448

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.03.039

Keywords

Stop-signal task; Post-error slowing; Relapse; Alcohol use disorder; Cognition

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the potential changes in behavioral adjustment in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and its association with relapse. The results showed significant differences in stop signal reaction time (SSRT) and trigger failure between the AUD and control groups. The relapsed group exhibited longer post-error slowing (PES), and PES could predict relapse in AUD.
Background: Relapse characterizes addiction. The cognitive phenotype underlying relapse in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) remain unelucidated. Here we aimed to investigate the potential changes in behavioral adjustment in AUD, and the association with relapse.Method: Forty-seven subjects with AUD at Shandong Mental Health Center completed the stop-signal task, the PACS, the Beck Depression Inventory and the State-Trait anxiety questionnaires. Thirty age-matched male healthy subjects served as the control group (HC). In the follow-up, twenty-one subjects remained abstinent, while twenty-six subjects relapsed. Independent sample t-test was applied to measure differences between two groups and logistic regression analysis was conducted to explore the potential predictors on relapse.Results: The results showed that there were significant differences in stop signal reaction time (SSRT) and trigger failure between the AUD and HC groups. Relapsed group showed longer post-error slowing (PES) when compared to the non-relapsed group. The PES could predict relapse in alcohol use disorder.Conclusion: Individuals with AUD showed impaired inhibitory control, which may predict relapse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available