4.4 Article

Design of an Internal Osculating Wave-Rider Intake

Journal

JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages 377-389

Publisher

AMER INST AERONAUTICS ASTRONAUTICS
DOI: 10.2514/1.B38916

Keywords

Hypersonic Aircraft; Aerodynamic Properties; Conical Shock Wave; Boundary Layer Separation; Adverse Pressure Gradient; Oblique Shock Wave; Hypersonic Inlets; Inlet Design; Hypersonic Airbreathing Engines; Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents the design of an inward-turning high-speed three-dimensional streamline-traced intake using osculating axisymmetric theory. The design criteria includes a stitched Busemann diffuser and internal conical flow-A solution for efficient compression, high flow uniformity, and straight leading-edge shocks of equal strength. A novel method for constructing the inlet cowl is also introduced. The validation of the design method is done through computational fluid dynamic results of the two-dimensional parent flowfields and the full three-dimensional design.
The design of an inward-turning high-speed three-dimensional streamline-traced intake is presented from osculating axisymmetric theory. To satisfy the osculating intake design criteria, a stitched Busemann diffuser and internal conical flow-A solution are used as the basic isentropic compressive streamline. This new contour provides efficient compression, high flow uniformity, and straight leading-edge shocks of equal strength. Additionally, a novel method for constructing the inlet cowl is presented. The combined process leads to a new method of high-speed intake design. A generic shape-transitioned intake is constructed and named the Indiana inlet for the Indiana universities that contributed to the project. Computational fluid dynamic results are assessed to validate the design method for the two-dimensional parent flowfields and the full three-dimensional design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available