4.8 Article

Effects of drying rate and slurry microstructure on the formation process of LiB cathode and electrochemical properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 568, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232983

Keywords

AB network structure; Particle sedimentation; Packing density; Pe ?clet number

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The drying process of electrode slurry is vital for achieving better electrochemical performance in LiB, but it remains poorly understood. The lack of information on slurry microstructure also complicates the solution. This study prepares and characterizes cathode slurries with different internal structures using rheological properties. The drying process of the coating layer is evaluated by measuring film shrinkage. It is found that uniform mixing of coarse particles of active material and the network structure of acetylene-black particles leads to a low drying rate, particle segregation, and poor cycle performance.
The drying process of electrode slurry for LiB should be crucial to obtain higher electrochemical performance, but it has been a black box. Furthermore, the lack of sufficient information on slurry microstructure complicates solving this issue. In this study, the cathode slurries having different internal structures are prepared and characterized by rheological properties. The drying process of the coating layer is evaluated in terms of film shrinkage. When the coarse particles of active material and the network structure of acetylene-black particles are uniformly mixed, a low drying rate results in extensive particle segregation and poor cycle performance. On the other hand, it is found that insufficient dispersion of active materials causes poor rate performance. Under the optimal drying condition, the slurry microstructure is found not to affect battery performance. However, the optimization of drying conditions requires consideration of material mobility during drying.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available