4.8 Article

Performance of activated stainless steel and nickel-based anodes in alkaline water electrolyser

Journal

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
Volume 564, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.232828

Keywords

OER; Stainless steel; Alloys; Nickel; Alkaline water electroyser; High pressure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Four different alloys are electro-oxidized, evaluated, and characterized for their OER activity in alkaline conditions. The study shows that an increase in surface nickel content improves the OER activity. The activated SS316 anode outperforms both the Ni and untreated SS316 anodes under various temperature and pressure conditions. The in-situ activation method also enhances the OER activity of SS316.
Four different alloys including SS316, SS304, Inconel718 and Incoloy800 are activated by electro-oxidation at +1.70 V vs. RHE in 7.5 M KOH for 18 h. Their OER activity are evaluated ex-situ using linear sweep voltammetry in 1.0 M KOH in a three-electrode electrochemical cell. X-ray photoelectron microscopy and scanning electron microscopy are used to obtain the surface composition and surface morphology. It is found that the OER activity improves as the Ni content at the surface increases. A Ni mesh along with untreated and activated SS316 meshes were investigated in-situ in 30 wt% KOH at 80 degrees C in an alkaline electrolyser. The effect of temperature up to 80 degrees C as well as pressure up to 9 bar are studied on the cell performance. It is observed that the cell with activated SS316 as anode is outperforming those with the Ni and untreated SS316 as anode. Up to 255 h durability tests at constant current of 0.8 A cm-2 at 80 degrees C and 9 bar shows no degradation in the performance of the cells con-taining Ni and activated SS316 as anode. SS316 is also activated in-situ at 1.76 A cm-2 for 18 h and 2 bar. The in -situ activation improves the SS316 OER activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available