4.6 Article

In Situ Formation of Tungsten Nitride among Porous Carbon Polyhedra for High Performance Zinc-Iodine Batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
Volume 127, Issue 16, Pages 7609-7617

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c00678

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, tungsten nitride-modified porous carbon polyhedron was prepared and used as the electrode material to improve the capacity and stability of aqueous zinc-iodine batteries. The addition of tungsten nitride enhanced the loading capacity of iodine and improved the reversibility and cycling stability of the battery. This work provides an efficient strategy for preparing high-performing zinc-iodine batteries using metal nitride-modified porous carbon.
To address the low capacity and poor stability of aqueous zinc-iodine batteries owing to the insulating nature of iodine and the shuttle effect of polyiodide, herein, tungsten nitridemodified porous carbon polyhedron (W2N/N-C) was prepared via the pyrolysis of ZIF-8 injected with phosphotungstic acid (PTA@ ZIF-8). During the thermal treatment process, the self-nitridation enabled the in situ formation of tungsten nitride nanoparticles in hierarchical porous carbon with nitrogen doping for favorable loading of iodine. When used as the electrode material, the zinc- iodine battery exhibited the low polarization during the charge/ discharge process with improved reversibility and good cycling stability for 2000 cycles. The improved electrochemical performance would be attributed to the confinement effect of W2N/N-C for the reversible conversion between iodine and polyiodide, thus enhancing the redox reversibility and utilization of active materials. The present work demonstrates an efficient strategy to prepare porous carbon with metal nitrides via the combination of carbonization and self-nitridation process for high-performing zinc-iodine battery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available