4.4 Article

Cluster-Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Physician-Directed Clinical Decision Support Versus Patient-Directed Education to Promote Appropriate Use of Opioids for Chronic Pain

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages 1745-1758

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.06.001

Keywords

Chronic pain; Opioids; Clinical decision support; Patient education; Communication

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the effectiveness of physician-directed clinical decision support (CDS) through electronic health records with patient-directed education in promoting appropriate opioid use. The results suggest that patient-directed education may improve patient-physician communication satisfaction, while physician-directed CDS may have greater potential to reduce high-risk opioid dosing.
We compared the effectiveness of physician-directed clinical decision support (CDS) ad-ministered via electronic health record versus patient-directed education to promote the appropriate use of opioids by conducting a cluster-randomized trial involving 82 primary care physicians and 951 of their patients with chronic pain. Primary outcomes were satisfaction with patient-physician commu-nication consumer assessment of health care providers and system clinician and group survey (CG-CAHPS) and pain interference patient-reported outcomes measurement information system. Secondary outcomes included physical function (patient-reported outcomes measurement information system), depression (PHQ-9), high-risk opioid prescribing (> 90 morphine milligram equivalents per day [>= 90 mg morphine equivalent/day]), and co-prescription of opioids and benzodiazepines. We used multi-level regression to compare longitudinal difference-in-difference scores between arms. The odds of achieving the maximum CG-CAHPS score were 2.65 times higher in the patient education versus the CDS arm (P = .044; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-6.80). However, baseline CG-CAHPS scores were dis-similar between arms, making these results challenging to interpret definitively. No difference in pain interference was found between groups (Coef = -0.64, 95% CI -2.66 to 1.38). The patient education arm experienced higher odds of Rx >= 90 milligrams morphine equivalent/day (odds ratio = 1.63; P = .010; 95% CI 1.13, 2.36). There were no differences between groups in physical function, depression, or co-pre-scription of opioids and benzodiazepines. These results suggest that patient-directed education may have the potential to improve satisfaction with patient-physician communication, whereas physician-directed CDS via electronic health records may have greater potential to reduce high-risk opioid dosing. More evidence is needed to ascertain the relative cost-effectiveness between strategies.Perspective: This article presents the results of a comparative-effectiveness study of 2 broadly used communication strategies to catalyze dialog between patients and primary care physicians around chronic The results add to the literature and offer about the relative benefits of physician-directed versus patient-directed interventions to promote the appro- priate use of opioids.(R) 2023 (R) Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc All reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available