4.4 Article

Impact of stent-retriever tip design on distal embolization during mechanical thrombectomy: a randomized in vitro evaluation

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020382

Keywords

device; embolic; intervention; stent; stroke

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the recanalization and embolic outcomes of three different stent-retrievers in mechanical thrombectomy. The results showed that the filter-tip stent-retriever significantly reduced the number of distally embolized large clots and increased the chances of first-pass complete recanalization when facing fragment-prone clots.
BackgroundRepeated number of passes, clot fragmentation, and distal embolization during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) lead to worse clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. This study aimed to assess the recanalization and embolic outcomes of different stent-retrievers (SRs): open-tip SR (Solitaire X 6x40 mm), closed-tip SR (EmboTrap II 5x33 mm), and filter-tip SR (NeVa NET 5.5x37 mm). MethodsStiff-friable clot analogs were used to create middle cerebral artery (M1-MCA) occlusions in a benchtop model. After occlusion, experiments were randomized into one of the three treatment arms. The thrombectomy technique consisted of retrieving the SR into a balloon guide catheter under proximal flow arrest and continuous aspiration. A total of 150 single-attempt cases were performed (50 cases/treatment arm). Distal emboli (>100 & mu;m) were collected and analyzed after each experiment. ResultsFilter-tip SR achieved a non-significantly higher first-pass recanalization rate than open-tip SR and closed-tip SR (66% vs 48% vs 44%; P=0.064). Filter-tip SR prevented clot fragments>1 mm from embolizing distal territories in 44% of cases, compared with 16% in open-tip SR and 20% in closed-tip (P=0.003). There were no significant differences between treatment arms in terms of total emboli count (open-tip=19.2 & PLUSMN;13.1, closed-tip=19.1 & PLUSMN;10.7, filter-tip=17.2 & PLUSMN;13.0; P=0.660). Nonetheless, the number of large emboli (>1 mm) and total area of emboli were significantly lower in the filter-tip arm (n=0.88 & PLUSMN;1.2, A=2.06 & PLUSMN;1.85 mm(2)) than in the closed-tip arm (n=2.34 & PLUSMN;3.38, A=4.06 & PLUSMN;4.80 mm(2); P<0.05). ConclusionsWhen facing fragment-prone clots, the filter-tip SR significantly reduces the number of large clots (>1 mm) that embolize distally during an MT procedure, which in turn may increase the chances of first-pass complete recanalization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available