4.4 Article

Theoretical design of new insensitive high energy metal complexes based on the double fused-ring insensitive ligands strategy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MODELING
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-023-05478-8

Keywords

Energetic compounds; Metal complexes; Insensitive high energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A total of 24 nitrogen-rich fused-ring energetic metal complexes were designed and studied. The structures were modified by introducing different metals and energetic groups, resulting in compounds with higher energy and lower sensitivity compared to a well-known high energy compound. The effects of different metals and small energetic groups on the structure and properties were investigated. The results showed that copper, NO2, and C(NO2)(3) increased the energy, while cobalt and NH2 helped reduce the sensitivity.
ContextIn this work, 24 new nitrogen-rich fused-ring energetic metal complexes were designed based on the double fused-ring insensitive ligands strategy. First, 7-nitro-3-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)-[1,2,4]triazolo[5,1-c][1,2,4]triazin-4-amine and 6-amino-3-(4H,8H-bis([1,2,5]oxadiazolo)[3,4-b:3 ',4 '-e]pyrazin-4-yl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine-1,5-dioxide were linked together by coordinating with metals cobalt and copper. Then, three energetic groups (NH2, NO2, and C(NO2)(3)) were introduced into the system to modify the structure and adjust the performance. Then, their structures and properties were investigated theoretically; the effects of different metals and small energetic groups were studied also. Finally, 9 compounds which have both higher energy and lower sensitivity than the famous high energy compound compound 1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine were selected out. In addition, it was found that copper, NO2, and C(NO2)(3) could increase the energy while cobalt and NH2 would be helpful for reducing the sensitivity.MethodsCalculations were performed at the TPSS/6-31G(d) level by using the Gaussian 09 software.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available