4.5 Editorial Material

Surgical Neuropelveology: Laparoscopic Nerve-sparing Excision of a Pelvic Schwannoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages 691-691

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.06.003

Keywords

Schwannoma; Laparoscopy; Nerve-sparing; Sacral plexus; Neuropelveology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article demonstrates a laparoscopic approach for safely managing advanced pelvic Schwannoma. Schwannomas are benign tumors arising from well-differentiated Schwann cells of peripheral nerve sheaths. They have a low rate of malignant transformation and recurrence after resection. The article showcases a minimally invasive procedure for excision of a pelvic Schwannoma originating from the left sacral root S1.
Study Objective: To show how advanced pelvic Schwannoma can be safely managed with a laparoscopic approach.Design: Demonstration of the laparoscopic technique with narrated video footage.Setting: Schwannomas are benign tumors that arise from well-differentiated Schwann cells (glial cells) of peripheral nerve sheaths. Schwannomas are nonaggressive, slow-growing, solitary masses with a low rate of malignant transformation and a low risk of recurrence after resection. They rarely occur in the pelvis, with a reported incidence of 1% to 3%. Tumors involving spinal nerve roots commonly present with radicular pain and nerve compression syndromes (Supplemental Video 1-3). This video shows the management of pelvic Schwannoma originating from the left sacral root S1 by a minimally invasive approach.Interventions: Laparoscopic nerve-sparing excision of a pelvic Schwannoma.Conclusion: Historically, pelvic schwannomas have been managed mainly by laparotomy. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility and safety of a large pelvic Schwannoma excision by a minimally invasive approach. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2023) 30, 691.(c) 2023 AAGL. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available