4.7 Article

Fragment Hopping-Based Design of Novel Biphenyl-DAPY Derivatives as Potent Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors Featuring Significantly Improved Anti-Resistance Efficacy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 66, Issue 7, Pages 4755-4767

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01900

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of novel biphenyl-DAPY derivatives were developed using the fragment-hopping strategy to enhance the anti-resistance efficacy of a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). Most of the compounds exhibited improved anti-HIV-1 potency, with compound 8r showing exceptional potency against wild-type HIV-1 and mutant strains. The new DAPY analogue had lower cytotoxicity, higher selectivity index, and favorable pharmacokinetic properties, making it a potential candidate for HIV treatment.
To enhance the anti-resistance efficacy of our previously reported non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) 4, a series of novel biphenyl-DAPY derivatives were developed using the fragment-hopping strategy. Most of the compounds 8a-v exhibited remarkably improved anti-HIV-1 potency. The most active compound 8r proved to be exceptionally potent against the wild-type HIV-1 (EC50 = 2.3 nM) and five mutant strains, such as K103N (EC50 = 8 nM) and E138K (EC50 = 6 nM), significantly better than 4. The new DAPY analogue was 8-fold less cytotoxic and had a 17-fold higher selectivity index (CC50 = 40.77 mu M, SI > 17391) than etravirine and rilpivirine. Also, it displayed favorable pharmacokinetic properties with an oral bioavailability of 31.19% and weak sensitivity toward both CYP and hERG. No apparent acute toxicity (2 g/kg) and tissue damage occurred. These findings will further expand the possibility of successfully identifying biphenyl-DAPY analogues as highly potent, safe, and orally active NNRTIs for HIV treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available