4.7 Article

Sensitivity of rapid antigen tests for Omicron subvariants of SARS-CoV-2

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Immunology

Variable detection of Omicron-BA.1 and -BA.2 by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests

Andreas Osterman et al.

Summary: During 2022, the dominant variant of concern in the COVID-19 pandemic has been Omicron (B.1.1.529) and its subvariants, including Omicron-BA.1 and -BA.2. A laboratory study evaluated the performance of five SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (RATs) and found significant differences in the detection of Omicron-BA.1 and Omicron-BA.2. The RATs showed non-significant differences in the limit of detection for these subvariants, but significant overall heterogeneity among the five tests. The worst performing RAT required up to 22-fold higher viral loads compared to the best performing RAT to yield a positive result.

MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY (2023)

Article Microbiology

Performance Evaluation of Five Rapid At-Home COVID-19 Antigen Tests against the Omicron Variant

Victor A. A. Sugiharto et al.

Summary: The emergence of the Omicron variant may affect the sensitivity of diagnostic tests for detecting SARS-CoV-2. However, a study found that rapid COVID-19 antigen tests had similar levels of sensitivity for both Omicron and non-Omicron variants. Therefore, these tests can continue to be used as part of public health measures to combat the spread of the Omicron variant.

MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM (2023)

Article Virology

Determining the reliability of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in fully vaccinated individuals

Nareshkumar Poopalasingam et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the performance of the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag Test in detecting SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals using RT-qPCR and rapid antigen detection testing. The results showed that RADT testing remains a valuable tool in detecting breakthrough infections with high viral RNA loads.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY (2022)

Article Immunology

Impaired detection of omicron by SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests

Andreas Osterman et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the performance of nine SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests (RATs) in a single-centre laboratory study. The results showed that higher virus loads were required for omicron-containing samples compared to delta-containing samples in order to test positive in these point-of-care tests. However, testing of expanded virus stocks suggested a comparable RAT sensitivity for both omicron and delta variants, questioning the predictive value of in vitro studies for clinical performance. Given the importance of RATs in national testing strategies during the omicron wave, awareness must be increased for the reduced detection rate of omicron infections by RATs and a short list of suitable RATs should be disclosed.

MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY (2022)

Article Virology

Analytical sensitivity of the Rapid Antigen Test kits for detection of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant BA.2 sublineage

Gannon C. K. Mak et al.

Summary: In this study, the analytical sensitivity of 12 Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) kits for detecting Omicron BA.2 was evaluated. The results showed that all 12 RAT kits had comparable sensitivity and can be used as a first-line screening tool for the rapidly spreading Omicron BA.2.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY (2022)

Article Virology

Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant

Jean-Louis Bayart et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the analytical performance of rapid antigen detection tests for the Delta and Omicron variants. The results showed poor performances for the rapidly antigen detection tests, especially for samples with low viral loads, particularly for the Omicron strain.

VIRUSES-BASEL (2022)

Review Biology

The Performance of Lateral Flow Tests in the Age of the Omicron: A Rapid Systematic Review

Qin Xiang Ng et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the performance of lateral flow tests in detecting the omicron coronavirus variant and found that these devices have poorer performance, especially in samples with high cycle threshold values and asymptomatic individuals.

LIFE-BASEL (2022)

Article Microbiology

Decreased Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Test Is Associated with a Lower Viral Load of Omicron than Delta SARS-CoV-2 Variant

Theophile Cocherie et al.

Summary: Large-scale screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection is important for epidemic prevention and control. This study compared the clinical and virological characteristics of individuals infected by Delta or Omicron variants and found that Omicron-infected individuals had lower sensitivity of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) due to lower viral load.

MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM (2022)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

COVID-19 Symptoms and Duration of Rapid Antigen Test Positivity at a Community Testing and Surveillance Site During Pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron BA.1 Periods

Carina Marquez et al.

Summary: This study compared COVID-19 symptoms during different virus variant periods and found that upper respiratory tract symptoms were more commonly reported during the Omicron BA.1 period, with differences by vaccination status. Rapid antigen test positivity remained high 5 days after symptom onset, supporting guidelines requiring a negative test to inform the length of the isolation period.

JAMA NETWORK OPEN (2022)

Article Virology

Evaluation of rapid antigen detection kit from the WHO Emergency Use List for detecting SARS-CoV-2

Gannon C. K. Mak et al.

Summary: The Panbio COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test Device showed lower sensitivity compared to RT-PCR, with a clinical sensitivity of 68.6% for detecting specimens from COVID-19 patients. It shared similar performance with another kit from the WHO Emergency Use List, the Standard Q COVID-19 Ag, indicating the importance of understanding the clinical characteristics of RAD kits for guiding testing strategies in different settings.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY (2021)

Article Infectious Diseases

Evaluating a novel, highly sensitive, and quantitative reagent for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigen

Ryo Kobayashi et al.

Summary: A novel quantitative reagent for detecting SARS-CoV-2 antigen showed high sensitivity and specificity in early and accurate detection. However, discordant results were observed in some cases between antigen and nucleic acid tests, indicating the need for further investigation.

JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY (2021)

Article Biochemical Research Methods

Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid antigen test to the real star Sars-CoV-2 RT PCR kit

Alexander Kruettgen et al.

Summary: The study found that the specificity of the SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test is higher than its sensitivity, with high accuracy for samples with a cycle threshold of less than 25. It is suitable for differentiating contagious and non-contagious SARS-CoV-2 patients.

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS (2021)

Article Virology

Comparative Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Tests for the Delta Variant (B.1.617.2) of SARS-CoV-2

Yuko Sakai-Tagawa et al.

Summary: In this study, the sensitivity of 27 RATs to the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant was examined, with 9 of them showing superior sensitivity. Most RATs had a detection threshold of 7500 pfu, which may miss individuals shedding low levels of infectious virus.

VIRUSES-BASEL (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Seven Rapid Antigen Detection Kits for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus

Nahal Eshghifar et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the analytical performance of rapid antigen tests used for detecting SARS-CoV-2 viral antigen compared to RT-PCR molecular assay. Results showed that rapid antigen tests are less sensitive than RT-PCR tests and are not reliable for asymptomatic patients with low viral load.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE (2021)

Article Immunology

Comparison of four commercial, automated antigen tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern

Andreas Osterman et al.

Summary: A study evaluated the performance of five commercial antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2, finding that automated quantitative tests had specificities ranging from 97.0% to 99.7% but low clinical sensitivities. The study emphasized the need for careful evaluation of any alternative testing strategies before widespread implementation to complement nucleic acid-based assays.

MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND IMMUNOLOGY (2021)

Editorial Material Medicine, General & Internal

Interpreting Diagnostic Tests for SARS-CoV-2

Nandini Sethuraman et al.

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2020)

Letter Microbiology

Evaluation of a Rapid Diagnostic Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen in Nasopharyngeal Swabs

Sidonie Lambert-Niclot et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY (2020)

Article Infectious Diseases

Evaluation of a novel antigen-based rapid detection test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples

Lorena Porte et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES (2020)

Article Virology

Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus

Gannon C. K. Mak et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY (2020)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Development and Potential Usefulness of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip Diagnostic Assay in a Pandemic Context

Pascal Mertens et al.

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE (2020)

Article Virology

Comparison of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19

Seiya Yamayoshi et al.

VIRUSES-BASEL (2020)