4.6 Article

A contemporary analysis of pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery: Is this a risk factor?

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 151, Issue 5, Pages 1288-1297

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.12.063

Keywords

pulmonary hypertension; mitral valve surgery; tricuspid valve surgery

Funding

  1. Novartis
  2. Bayer
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. DC Devices
  5. Edwards
  6. GE
  7. Abbott

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) has been considered a risk factor for mortality in cardiac surgery. Among mitral valve surgery (MVS) patients, we sought to determine if severe PHT increases mortality risk and if patients who undergo concomitant tricuspid valve surgery (TVS) incur additional risk. Methods: Preoperative PHT was assessed in 1571 patients undergoing MVS, from 2004 to 2013. Patients were stratified into PHT groups as follows (mm Hg): none (<35); moderate (35-49); severe (50-79); and extreme (>80). Propensity-score matching resulted in a total of 430 patients, by PHT groups, and 384 patients, by TVS groups. Results: Patients with severe PHT had higher mortality, both 30-day (4% PHT vs 1% no PHT, P < .02) and late (defined as survival at 5 years): 75.5 % severe versus 91.9% no PHT (P < .001). In propensity-score matched groups, severe PHT was not a risk factor for 30-day (3 % each, P = 1.0) or late mortality (86.2% severe vs 87.1% no PHT; P =.87). TVS did not increase 30-day (4.7% TVS vs 4.2% no TVS, P =.8) or late mortality (78.7% TVS vs 75.3% no TVS, P =.90). Late survival was lower in extreme PHT (75.4% vs no PHT 91.5%, P =.007), and a trend was found in 30 -day mortality (11% extreme vs 3% no PHT, P =.16). Conclusions: Mortality in MVS is unaffected by severe PHT or the addition of TVS, yet extreme PHT remains a risk factor. Severe PHT (50-79 mm Hg) should not preclude surgery; concomitant TVS does not increase mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available