Lowering the age limit of access to the identity of the gamete donor by donor offspring: the argument against

Countries that abolished donor anonymity have imposed age limits for access to certain types of information by donor offspring. In the UK and the Netherlands, a debate has started on whether these age limits should be lowered or abolished all together. This article presents some arguments against lowering the age limits as a general rule for all donor children. The focus is on whether one should give a child the right to obtain the identity of the donor at an earlier age than is presently stipulated. The first argument is that there is no evidence that a change in age will increase the total well-being of the donor offspring as a group. The second argument stresses that the rights language used for the donor-conceived child isolates the child from his or her family and this is unlikely to be in the best interest of the child. Finally, lowering the age limit reintroduces the genetic father in the family and expresses the bionormative ideology that contradicts gamete donation as a practice.

Automated summary

Some countries have age limits for donor offspring to access certain information after abolishing donor anonymity. In the UK and the Netherlands, there is a debate on whether to lower or abolish these age limits. This article presents arguments against lowering the age limits as a general rule, questioning the impact on the well-being of donor children, the isolation of the child from their family, and the contradiction with the practice of gamete donation.