4.6 Article

Preparation, properties, and reliability of Cu/Sn composite joints with porous Cu as interlayer for high-temperature resistant packaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, porous metals have been used for transient liquid phase bonding due to their high specific surface areas. However, the reliability issues of porous metal joints have been neglected in current studies. In this study, we prepared a porous Cu joint for high-temperature-resistant packaging and investigated its aging and thermal shock resistance. The results showed that the porous Cu joints exhibited good aging resistance and excellent thermal shock resistance.
In recent years, porous metals have been used for transient liquid phase bonding because of their high specific surface areas. However, current studies have mainly focused on the preparation of porous metal joints and lack awareness of their reliability issues. Therefore, we prepared a porous Cu joint for high-temperature-resistant packaging and investigated its aging and thermal shock resistance. Porous Cu joints were prepared using commercial porous Cu and pure Sn foils. After soldering at 250 degrees C for 10 min, the shear strength of the porous Cu joints was 83 MPa and 61 MPa at 25 and 300 degrees C of shear temperatures, respectively. The electrical resistivity and thermal conductivity of the porous Cu joints were 8.65 mu ohm center dot cm and 58.9 W/(m center dot K), respectively. The room-temperature shear strength of the joints aged at 300 degrees C for 1000 h could still reach 60 MPa. Reticular Cu2O/Cu3Sn was discovered for the first time in aged porous Cu joints. After 1000 cycles, the room-temperature shear strength of the joints could still reach 73 MPa, which was only 14.5% lower than that of the joints without the thermal shock test. In conclusion, porous Cu joints exhibited good aging resistance and excellent thermal shock resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available