4.7 Article

Response mechanism study of alternate ZrC-10vol.% SiC/ZrC-70vol.% SiC coatings with various sublayer thicknesses for cyclic and long-term thermal exposure

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages 153-162

Publisher

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.09.013

Keywords

Alternate coating; Sublayer numbers; Carbon; carbon composites; High -temperature test; Plasma spraying

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the influence of sublayer numbers on structure evolution and thermal stress level was investigated. An alternate coating with ZrC-10 vol.% SiC and ZrC-70 vol.% SiC sublayers was designed and assessed using oxyacetylene torch. The results showed that the coating with 6 sublayers exhibited the best ablation property and the least thermal stress among all samples. Si-based products were found to contribute to the development of a dense profile on the surface, and the generated alternate dense/porous scale had good toughness.
To explore the influence of sublayer numbers on the structure evolution and thermal stress level, an alternate coating consisting of ZrC-10 vol.% SiC and ZrC-70 vol.% SiC sublayers was designed in this work. With a basically consistent general thickness, three coatings constituted by 2, 4 and 6 sublayers were prepared by plasma spraying, which then were assessed using an oxyacetylene torch under cyclic and long-term exposure. The coating with 6 sublayers was supposed to be the one with the best ablation property, finite element analysis also evidenced its least thermal stress among all these samples. After being ablated for 240 s, the linear and mass ablation rates of the coating with 6 sublayers decreased by 51.27% and 14.41% as compared to that with 4 sublayers. Post-test analysis proved the existence of Si-based products, which help the outmost surface to develop a dense profile. Additionally, the yielded alternate dense/porous scale had a preferable toughness, allowing it to maintain a good integrity.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available