4.6 Article

Long-term results of the valve reimplantation technique using a graft with sinuses

Journal

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
Volume 151, Issue 1, Pages 112-119

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.026

Keywords

aortic valve; aortic root; valve repair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Aortic valve reimplantation is the most commonly used technique to spare the aortic valve. Long-term results data are scarce and available only with the use of standard straight graft. We examined the long-term results of reimplantation of the aortic valve using a graft incorporating sinuses of Valsalva. Methods: From May 2000 to December 2014, 124 patients had an aortic valve reimplanted into a graft with sinuses of Valsalva. The mean age was 53 +/- 13 years and the majority were men (87%). Marfan syndrome was present in 21 patients (17%) and 12% had a bicuspid valve. Patients were prospectively followed by means of transthoracic echocardiography. The mean follow-up was 63 +/- 52 months. Results: Overall survival at 5, 10, and 13 years was 94.4% +/- 2.2%, 90.5% +/- 4.4%, and 81.4% +/- 7.3%, respectively. Six patients required reoperation within a time frame of 6 to 96 months. None of the patients died at reoperation. Freedom from reoperation was 95.4% +/- 2.3% at 5 years and 90.1% +/- 4.3% at 10 and 13 years. All patients who needed reoperation had surgery during the first 5 years. Three patients had residual aortic insufficiency >2. Considering also all patients who underwent reoperation because of aortic insufficiency, freedom from moderate to severe residual aortic insufficiency was 94.1% +/- 2.6% at 5 years, and 87.1% +/- 4.7% at 10 and 13 years. Conclusions: The majority of patients who had their valve reimplanted in a graft with sinuses continue to perform well after 10 years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available