Techno-economic model-based design space exploration of 'combined' ship propulsion systems

The architecture of a ship propulsion system, developed during early stages of the overall ship design process, has a very large impact on the overall design and performance of the ship. The design space exploration to arrive at the final ship propulsion architecture can be a rather complex process for high-performance 'combined' ship propulsion systems designed to achieve multiple, often conflicting, design objectives. This paper proposes a novel process for the process of design space exploration based on a model-based 'Techno-economic & Environmental Risk Assessment' (TERA) approach, executed using a hybrid 'Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making' (MCDM) procedure, to select a compromise solution from competing propulsion system architectures populating the design space. The process utilizes a combination of performance data generated from performance simulation of developed models, as well as comparative expert opinions-based metrics for information not available early in the ship design process for selection of a 'compromise solution'. The paper includes an illustrative example of application of the proposed process for design space exploration for a combined propulsion system architecture for a notional destroyer.

Automated summary

The architecture of a ship propulsion system has a significant impact on the overall design and performance of the ship. This paper proposes a novel process for design space exploration using a model-based approach and multiple-criteria decision-making to select a compromise solution from competing propulsion system architectures. The process combines performance simulation data and expert opinions-based metrics for information not available early in the ship design process.