4.7 Review

Updates on LI-RADS Treatment Response Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Focusing on MRI

Journal

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages 1641-1654

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28659

Keywords

hepatocellular carcinoma; locoregional therapy; Liver Imaging Data and Reporting System treatment response algorithm; treatment response assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the increase in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-directed therapies, the assessment of lesion response has become more complex. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (LI-RADS TRA) was created to standardize the evaluation of response after locoregional therapy (LRT) using contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. This article reviews the expected MR imaging findings after different forms of LRT, explains the application of LI-RADS TRA for different types of LRT, explores emerging literature on LI-RADS TRA, and highlights future updates to the algorithm.
As the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and subsequent treatments with liver-directed therapies rise, the complexity of assessing lesion response has also increased. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (LI-RADS) treatment response algorithm (LI-RADS TRA) was created to standardize the assessment of response after locoregional therapy (LRT) on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. Originally created based on expert opinion, these guidelines are currently undergoing revision based on emerging evidence. While many studies support the use of LR-TRA for evaluation of HCC response after thermal ablation and intra-arterial embolic therapy, data suggest a need for refinements to improve assessment after radiation therapy. In this manuscript, we review expected MR imaging findings after different forms of LRT, clarify how to apply the current LI-RADS TRA by type of LRT, explore emerging literature on LI-RADS TRA, and highlight future updates to the algorithm. Evidence Level3. Technical EfficacyStage 2.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available