4.7 Article

Effects of meteorological forcing uncertainty on high-resolution snow modeling and streamflow prediction in a mountainous karst watershed

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 619, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129304

Keywords

Snow hydrology; Karst; Rainfall-runoff modeling; Deep learning; Downscaling; Meteorological uncertainty

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the mountainous Western U.S., accurately simulating streamflow in snow-dominated, karst basins is important for water resources management. To overcome the challenges of high spatiotemporal variability and scarcity of climate stations, a physically based snow model is used to simulate snow processes, and deep learning is employed to simulate streamflow using the calculated snowmelt and potential evapotranspiration rates.
In the mountainous Western U.S., a considerable portion of water supply originates as snowmelt passing through karst watersheds. Accurately simulating streamflow in snow-dominated, karst basins is important for water re-sources management. However, this has been challenging due to high spatiotemporal variability of meteoro-logical and hydrogeological processes in these watersheds and scarcity of climate stations. To overcome these challenges, a physically based snow model is used to simulate snow processes at 100 m resolution, and the calculated snowmelt and potential evapotranspiration rates are fed into a deep learning model to simulate streamflow. The snow model was driven by meteorological variables from a regional scale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model or from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS-2). The two datasets were used both at the original resolution and downscaled to 100 m resolution based on orographic adjustments, leading to four sets of forcings. Snow model simulation results from the four sets of forcings showed large differences in simulated snow water equivalent (SWE) and snowmelt rate and timing. However, the dif-ferences were damped in simulated streamflow, as the deep learning model is partially immune to input bias and picked up different streamflow responses to snowmelt and rainfall when trained using snow model results. While the meteorological datasets considered yielded close streamflow simulation accuracy, averaging simulated streamflow from the four sets of forcings consistently achieved better performance, suggesting the value of including multiple meteorological datasets for modeling streamflow in mountainous watersheds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available