4.2 Article

Horizontal Foot Speed During Submaximal and Maximal Running

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN KINETICS
Volume 87, Issue -, Pages 1-9

Publisher

TERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD
DOI: 10.5114/jhk/159578

Keywords

bipedal gait; locomotor control; running biomechanics; sprinting; kinematics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantified the forward and backward foot speeds during steady-speed running and explored their relationship with sprinting performance. The results showed that both forward and backward foot speeds were significantly and positively correlated with running speed. However, contrary to expectations, faster runners did not necessarily exhibit lower ground speed difference values at top speed.
Horizontal foot speed is fundamental for running synchronization and stability, and may also be important for sprinting performance. In this investigation, we quantified the following during steady-speed running: (a) peak forward foot speed during the swing phase, (b) backward foot speed at touchdown, and (c) ground speed difference (GSD), i.e., the difference between forward running speed and backward foot speed at touchdown. We hypothesized that forward and backward foot speed would be significantly and positively correlated with top speed, and that GSD would be significantly and negatively correlated with top speed. Participants (20 male, 20 female) completed 40-m submaximal and maximal effort running trials, with kinematic data collected from 31-39 m. Across top speed trials, forward foot speed (r = 0.90, p < 0.001) and backward foot speed (r = 0.85, p < 0.001) were significantly and positively correlated with running speed. However, counter to expectations, GSD values slightly increased with top speed (r = 0.36, p = 0.027). These findings indicate that forward and backward foot speeds are important variables for sprinting performance, but faster runners may not necessarily exhibit lower GSD values at top speed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available