4.7 Article

Uptake, translocation, bioaccumulation, and bioavailability of organophosphate esters in rice paddy and maize fields

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 446, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130640

Keywords

OPEs; Soil; Rice; Maize; Bioavailability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rice and maize, two main crops in Northeast China, displayed different OPE concentrations in their soil-crop systems. The OPE concentrations were higher in paddy soil compared to maize soil. The study also indicated that other processes like growth dilution play a significant role in understanding OPE levels in plants.
Rice and maize are two main crops with different growth habits in Northeast China. To investigate the uptake, translocation, and accumulation of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in those two crops, we measured the OPE concentrations in their agricultural soil-crop systems during different growing seasons. OPE concentrations were higher in paddy (221 +/- 62.0 ng/g) than in maize (149 +/- 31.6 ng/g) soil, with higher OPE levels in the rhizo-sphere than in bulk soil for rice, and the opposite in maize. Two-step extractions were used to obtain the labile and stable adsorption components of OPEs. The stable-adsorbed OPEs were activated to be more bioavailable by root exudates as rice grew. OPEs in rice increased linearly with the growing period. The uptake and translocation processes of OPEs by crops were not well-explained by logKow alone, indicating other processes such as growth dilution are significant for understanding OPE levels in plant. The translocation factors of OPEs from nutritive to reproductive organs indicated that OPEs in rice seeds may follow the translocation from root to leaf and then transfer to grains. Two genera, Sphingomonas and Geobacter, associated with degradation of organophosphorus compounds were enriched in rhizosphere soils, indicating enhanced OPE degradation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available